The article argues that administrative courts are unlawful and are not sanctioned by the Queen and Parliament. The British Constitution is “unwritten,” with many of its principles found in common law and historic statutes. The document references Acts such as Magna Carta (1215), the Bill of Rights (1689), and the Supreme Court Act 1981 (now known as the Senior Courts Act 1981) as examples of constitutional acts. The document claims that performing administrative acts for the executive is incompatible with the oath taken by judges under the Promissory Oaths Act 1868, and a breach of this oath is considered perjury. It states that administrative law is an “arrangement” between the Executive and the Judiciary and has no authority for administrative courts in the country, and that no Act could be passed to legitimise them. The document also states that the public has a “right of passage” without “let or hindrance” and that only “Juristic persons” (legal entities) can be levied against, not human beings. It concludes that any laws inconsistent with the Act of Union 1707, which guarantees freedom of movement, are void.